Pollak: Trump Acquittal Shows Congress Is Not Exempt from the Constitution - American Patriots
Connect with us

#Politic

Pollak: Trump Acquittal Shows Congress Is Not Exempt from the Constitution

Spread the love

House impeachment managers argued Saturday, as throughout former President Donald Trump’s impeachment trial, that Congress is exempt from the Constitution.

Lead manager Rep. Raskin (D-MD) said that because this was not a criminal trial, the legal requirements for “incitement” did not apply, the right to due process did not apply, and even the cherished First Amendment did not apply. In effect, Raskin argued, Congress was exempt from following constitutional principles.

Last year, House Intelligence Committee Chair Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) made the same argument. Due process did not apply to the president in impeachment, he said, and therefore it did not matter that the president could not cross-examine witnesses, or call the so-called “whistleblower.” The House had clearly violated the president’s First, Fourth, Fifth, and Sixth Amendment rights, but Schiff told the Senate that Trump should have been grateful for the few protections he had.

That is not how Congress used to behave, nor how Americans saw Congress — until recently.

[sibwp_form id=1]

Several decades ago, there was a heated debate about religious displays on public property, such as Nativity scenes at Christmas. Civil libertarians argued that such displays were a violation of the First Amendment’s Establishment Clause. Many Jewish leaders agreed, drawing on a long and painful history in which Jews had suffered persecution in countries with official state religions.

But not all Jewish leaders opposed Nativity displays. One who dissented was the Lubavitcher Rebbe, Menachem Mendel Schneerson, leader of the Orthodox Chabad movement, who encouraged Jews to light Menorahs on public property during Chanukah.

Schneerson also supported prayer in public schools, which many liberal Jewish leaders opposed. He believed that indifference to religion among the contemporary public was a bigger problem than old medieval religious prejudices.

When Schneerson supported public religious displays, some fellow Jewish leaders were shocked, and outraged. One rabbi pursued a debate with Schneerson, wonderfully documented by Joseph Telushkin in his recent biography, Rebbe: The Life and Teachings of Menachem M. Schneerson, the Most Influential Rabbi in Modern History. He argued Jewish religious displays were “as much a violation of the constitutional principle of separation of church and state” as Nativity scenes.

Schneerson disagreed — citing Congress as an example.

No one who joined a Menorah lighting on public property could have “felt that his or her loyalty to the Constitution of the U.S.A. had been weakened … seeing that the U.S. Congress opens its [daily sessions] with a religious invocation, and surely the U.S. Congress, comprising each and every state of the Union, is the place where the Constitution of the U.S.A. should be most rigidly upheld,” he wrote (original emphasis).